pdpc_decisions_version_detail (view)
1 row where tags contains "Purpose Limitation" and "timestamp" is on date 2023-12-14
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: _commit_at (date), timestamp (date), tags (array), _changed_columns (array)
| _commit_at | _commit_hash | _id | _item | _version | _commit | description | tags | date | pdf-url | nature | title | url | timestamp | pdf-content | decision | _item_full_hash | _changed_columns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-14T14:54:52+00:00 | 0e20feac9c1e16c30580baa727a897e3bfcf8791 | 483 | 243 | 1 | 958 | Directions were issued to Tipros for failing to use or disclose personal data about an individual only for purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate. | [
"Consent",
"Notification",
"Purpose Limitation",
"Directions",
"Others"
] |
14 Dec 2023 | https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Commissions-Decisions/GD_TIPROS_080623.pdf | Consent, Notification, Purpose Limitation | Breach of the Purpose Limitation Obligation by Tipros | https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/all-commissions-decisions/2023/12/breach-of-the-purpose-limitation-obligation-by-tipros | 2023-12-14 | PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION COMMISSION [2023] SGPDPC 7 Case No. DP-2207-C0019 In the matter of an investigation under section 50(1) of the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 And Tipros … Organisation DECISION Page 1 of 8 Tipros Yeong Zee Kin, Deputy Commissioner — Case No. DP-2207-C0019 8 June 2023 Introduction 1. On 21 July 2022, the Personal Data Protection Commission (the “Commission”) received a complaint that Tipros (the “Organisation”), a sole proprietorship in the wholesale of and repair of electrical appliances, had unreasonably disclosed the personal data of the complainant when responding to the complainant’s review on the Organisation’s Google reviews page (the “Incident”). 2. The Commission commenced investigations to determine the Organisation’s compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (“PDPA”) and for suspected breaches of the same. Facts of the Case 3. The complainant had engaged the Organisation to repair a refrigerator. Following the repairs made, the complainant gave a “1-star” review on a Google reviews page “24hr fridge refrigerator #1 Quick repair service Trusted in Singapore”, which has since been renamed “Tipros.sg”. 4. The Organisation promptly responded to the complainant’s review. What is problematic was that the Organisation included the complainant’s personal data, including the complainant’s residential address and mobile number in their Page 2 of 8 response. The complainant filed a complaint with the Commission as the complainant was of the view that there was no reason for the Organisation to disclose her personal data in the course of responding to the review she left on the Organisation’s Google reviews page. 5. Apart from the Organisation’s response to the complainant’s review, the Commission found 13 other responses on the Organisation’s Google reviews page which disclosed, in a similar fashion, the personal data of other customers who had given reviews. Our Investigations 6. The Commission commenced investigations. In the course of investigations, it was … | Directions | acd36e3274c5e29fe0627b24b99136461cdd6c47 | [
"pdf-content",
"timestamp",
"decision",
"pdf-url",
"tags",
"nature",
"url",
"title",
"date",
"description"
] |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited
CREATE VIEW pdpc_decisions_version_detail AS select
commits.commit_at as _commit_at,
commits.hash as _commit_hash,
pdpc_decisions_version.*,
(
select json_group_array(name) from columns
where id in (
select column from pdpc_decisions_changed
where item_version = pdpc_decisions_version._id
)
) as _changed_columns
from pdpc_decisions_version
join commits on commits.id = pdpc_decisions_version._commit;